Texas law defines a criminal offense called Graffiti as intentionally or knowingly making “markings” on property that belongs to someone else without their “effective consent.” Prosecuting attorneys typically charge someone with Graffiti after a property owner notifies law enforcement that someone “tagged” their property. Sometimes surveillance footage is used in an attempt to identify the accused, and sometimes the accused person is allegedly “caught in the act.” In many ways, the Graffiti offense is similar to the crime of Criminal Mischief, and a person might be charged with both offenses. Learn more about Criminal Mischief
GRAFFITI ATTORNEY FAQs
- What is the current Texas law about Graffiti?
- What is the range of punishment for Graffiti?
- What kinds of tools fall under the category of paint, indelible marker, or engraving device?
- What exactly is Tangible Property?
- I thought I had permission, or I am unsure what effective consent means.
- What is pecuniary loss and how is that determined?
Graffiti is classified into different grades of punishment depending on the value of the damaged property. The punishment scheme is similar to the Theft offense and is discussed in detail below. Graffiti is classified in the Texas Penal Code under Title 7 “Offenses Against Property”, Section 2 “Arson, Criminal Mischief, and other Property Damage or Destruction”. Crimes under this section cover a wide range of offenses that focus on actions taken against property belong to other people. They may be destructive crimes, or may simply be crimes that cover actions that deface property.
The current Texas law is as follows:1
A person commits an offense if, without the effective consent of the owner, the person intentionally or knowingly makes markings, including inscriptions, slogans, drawings, or paintings, on the tangible property of the owner with:
(2) an indelible marker; or
(3) an etching or engraving device.
This very brief definition can cover a wide variety of situations. Spray painting is the most common kind of graffiti, but carving words onto a wall with a key, or even drawing a mustache on a political poster could qualify as Graffiti under this statute. The definition is deliberately vague and allows prosecutors a great deal of discretion in bringing a charge against an individual under this section.
Graffiti carries a wide range of punishments depending on the ‘pecuniary loss’ caused by the graffiti. Pecuniary loss is defined in more detail below, but in short it refers to the financial loss caused by the actions of someone else. Under Penal Code Section 28.08(b), a Graffiti conviction is a:
(1) a Class B misdemeanor if the amount of pecuniary loss is less than $500;
(2) a Class A misdemeanor if the amount of pecuniary loss is $500 or more but less than $1,500;
(3) a state jail felony if the amount of pecuniary loss is $1,500 or more but less than $20,000;
(4) a felony of the third degree if the amount of pecuniary loss is $20,000 or more but less than $100,000;
(5) a felony of the second degree if the amount of pecuniary loss is $100,000 or more but less than $200,000; or
(6) a felony of the first degree if the amount of pecuniary loss is $200,000 or more.
The type of property that is marked with graffiti is very important in determining the possible punishment. Spray painting a political poster that costs $5 to replace will be a class B misdemeanor, while engraving a sophisticated piece of technology that cost $50,000 to replace would carry the penalty for a third degree felony.
Additionally, the crime automatically becomes a State Jail Felony if it is done upon a “school, an institution of higher education, a place of worship or human burial, a public monument, or a community center that provides medical, social, or educational programs” and causes less than $20,000 in pecuniary loss.2 That means that even painting on a wall that only costs $200 to repair, if done at a school automatically is elevated from a Class B Misdemeanor to a State Jail Felony.
Paint is undefined in the statute. Indelible marker is defined as “a device that makes a mark with a paint or ink product that is specifically formulated to be more difficult to erase, wash out, or remove than ordinary paint or ink products”;3 this might include permanent markers, pens, and other similar instruments. Etching or engraving device is defined as “a device that makes a delineation or impression on tangible property, regardless of the manufacturer’s intended use for that device”.4
Tangible property means anything that you can physically touch or interact with. For example, a sign is a physical object and would be considered tangible property. The words on the sign, specifically the ideas behind them, are not physical. If you were to post your own sign with the same words, but with a giant X through them, you’re not tampering with the physical nature of the property, just the idea behind it. Ideas, thoughts, or slogans are not physical objects and are not covered under this statute.
The statute requires that a person make the markings without the consent (permission) of the property owner. That would mean that if you were given consent (permission) by the property owner, then you would not be guilty of this charge.
Effective consent means that you were either directly informed (either verbally or in writing) or implicitly given permission (meaning the actions of the property owner led you to believe you had consent). For example, if a property owner handed you a bucket of paint and said “take care of the house,” you would be reasonably led to believe you had his consent to paint the house, just as if he gave you the paint and had said “paint my house”.
Pecuniary loss is defined in Section 28.06 of the Penal Code. Pecuniary loss is defined in two ways:
The amount of pecuniary loss under this chapter, if the property is destroyed, is:
(1) the fair market value of the property at the time and place of the destruction; or
(2) if the fair market value of the property cannot be ascertained, the cost of replacing the property within a reasonable time after the destruction.
(b) The amount of pecuniary loss under this chapter, if the property is damaged, is the cost of repairing or restoring the damaged property within a reasonable time after the damage occurred.
This means that if the graffiti damages the property in such a way that the property is destroyed, then the pecuniary loss is whatever the value of the property is, as determined by looking at similar pieces of property (this is what is called ‘fair market value’). If the property is only damaged (and can be repaired), the pecuniary loss is whatever the cost of the repairs or restoration is (and this includes the cost of any replacement items plus the cost of labor).
Recent Case Results
- 2019 Not Guilty in Collin County DWI >0.15
- 2019 Not Guilty in Dallas County Indecency with a Child
- Oral Argument at the United States Federal 5th Circuit Court of Appeals on Prosecutorial Misconduct Claim arising out of Northern District of Texas
- 2018 Not Guilty in Martin County Aggravated Assault with a Deadly Weapon on a Peace Officer
- Not Guilty in 2018 Dallas County DWI Trial
- Client cleared in Dallas Police Shooting wrongful accusation
- Federal sentencing results in 10 Year Downward Deviation from Sentencing Guidelines in 2018
- Not Guilty Jury Verdict for client originally accused of Intoxication Manslaughter
- Case Dismissed after picking jury in Aggravated Sexual Assault of Child case in 2017
- United States Attorney dismisses case against client charged in El Paso Federal Court with Possession of Child Pornography
- ALL CHARGES DISMISSED against our client in the Twin Peaks Waco Biker case
- Client “No-billed” by grand jury investigating shooting death case
- Coverage of Case Involving Waco teacher sending messages to student
- Judge returns a Directed Verdict of Acquittal in case involving trainer of professional athletes
- Rare Not Guilty verdict in Rockwall County DWI
- 2016 Dismissal of Fort Worth Federal Possession of Obscene Visual Representation of the Sexual Abuse of Children
- Hill County Money Laundering case Dismissed and civil asset forfeiture assets returned
- Coverage of teen Lewisville client charged with hit-and-run death
- Two Montague County Indecency with a Child cases Dismissed