The Misuse of Official Information crime in the state of Texas makes it illegal for a public servant (like a judge or a legislator) to use secret information to obtain money, commit fraud or otherwise harm someone. Learn more detailed information about the Misuse of Official Information offense below.
MISUSE OF OFFICIAL INFORMATION ATTORNEY FAQs
Beware that “public servant” is defined broadly in case law. Public servant could include school administrators, teachers and anyone else that works for the government.
Have you been charged with Misuse of Official Information? Call criminal lawyer Paul Saputo at (888) 239-9305 to discuss legal representation.
These cases can be difficult to prosecute. In State v. Ford and State v. Newton, cases were dismissed because the information was excluded from the Public Information Act and thus not prohibited from disclosure. The salient point here is the subsection (d) definition of the type of information which is secret:
In this section, “information that has not been made public” means any information to which the public does not generally have access, and that is prohibited from disclosure under Chapter 552, Government Code.
Another notable case arose out of Victoria County in 2008, where a district attorney indicted the mayor, chief of police and others for Misuse of Official Information. The indictments were dismissed because the prosecuting attorney did not adequately handle the definition in subsection (d).
Misuse of Official Information is classified in the Texas Penal Code under Title 8 “Offenses Against Public Administration”, Chapter 39 “Abuse Of Office.”
The current Texas law is as follows:1
(a) A public servant commits an offense if, in reliance on information to which the public servant has access by virtue of the person’s office or employment and that has not been made public, the person:
(1) acquires or aids another to acquire a pecuniary interest in any property, transaction, or enterprise that may be affected by the information;
(2) speculates or aids another to speculate on the basis of the information; or
(3) as a public servant, including as a school administrator, coerces another into suppressing or failing to report that information to a law enforcement agency.
(b) A public servant commits an offense if with intent to obtain a benefit or with intent to harm or defraud another, he discloses or uses information for a nongovernmental purpose that:
(1) he has access to by means of his office or employment; and
(2) has not been made public.
(c) A person commits an offense if, with intent to obtain a benefit or with intent to harm or defraud another, he solicits or receives from a public servant information that:
(1) the public servant has access to by means of his office or employment; and
(2) has not been made public.
You can be charged with Misuse of Official Information if the state’s attorneys believe that each of the elements of 39.06(a) as described in the section above have been met.
If the offense falls under any subsection other than (a)(3) then a conviction for Misuse of Official Information is punished as a Felony of the Third Degree,3 with a maximum possible fine under Texas state law of up to $10,000 and prison time of up to 10 years. Learn about the differences between grades of felonies and misdemeanors
Recent Case Results
- 2019 Not Guilty in Collin County DWI >0.15
- 2019 Not Guilty in Dallas County Indecency with a Child
- Oral Argument at the United States Federal 5th Circuit Court of Appeals on Prosecutorial Misconduct Claim arising out of Northern District of Texas
- 2018 Not Guilty in Martin County Aggravated Assault with a Deadly Weapon on a Peace Officer
- Not Guilty in 2018 Dallas County DWI Trial
- Client cleared in Dallas Police Shooting wrongful accusation
- Federal sentencing results in 10 Year Downward Deviation from Sentencing Guidelines in 2018
- Not Guilty Jury Verdict for client originally accused of Intoxication Manslaughter
- Case Dismissed after picking jury in Aggravated Sexual Assault of Child case in 2017
- United States Attorney dismisses case against client charged in El Paso Federal Court with Possession of Child Pornography
- ALL CHARGES DISMISSED against our client in the Twin Peaks Waco Biker case
- Client “No-billed” by grand jury investigating shooting death case
- Coverage of Case Involving Waco teacher sending messages to student
- Judge returns a Directed Verdict of Acquittal in case involving trainer of professional athletes
- Rare Not Guilty verdict in Rockwall County DWI
- 2016 Dismissal of Fort Worth Federal Possession of Obscene Visual Representation of the Sexual Abuse of Children
- Hill County Money Laundering case Dismissed and civil asset forfeiture assets returned
- Coverage of teen Lewisville client charged with hit-and-run death
- Two Montague County Indecency with a Child cases Dismissed